Legal Opinion

Jahr v. IU International Corp.

District Court, M.D. North Carolina

Decided March 3, 1986No. Civ. A. No. C-85-972-GPublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM ORDER

RUSSELL A. ELIASON, United States Magistrate.

Plaintiff moves pursuant to Rule 30(b)(7), Fed.R.Civ.P., to take the telephonic deposition of William Scott, a resident of the State of California. She states that this witness has knowledge of facts central to the issues in this action, and that he was her supervisor at the time both of them were employed by defendants. Plaintiff alleges that due to her lack of financial means, she needs to depose the witness by telephone.

Defendants oppose the motion. They assert plaintiff must show extraordinary circumstances in order to be…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Colonial Times, Inc., D.B.A. The Daily Rag v. Honorable Oliver Gasch, United States District JudgeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
  2. United States v. Ricardo FerreraCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984
  3. In Re Edward James SessionsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
  4. Clem v. Allied Van Lines International Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1984
  5. Coyne v. HoussDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Webb v. Green Tree Servicing LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2012
  2. Rice's Toyota World, Inc. v. Southeast Toyota Distributors, Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1987
  3. Cressler v. NeuenschwanderDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1996
  4. Brown v. CarrDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2006
  5. Trinos v. Quality Staffing Services Corp.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2008

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API