Fausto v. Credigy Services Corp.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO COMPEL AND DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER
RICHARD SEEBORG, United States Magistrate Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiffs Manuel and Luz Fausto bring suit under federal and California debt collection laws prohibiting debt collectors from engaging in abusive, deceptive, or unfair collection practices. The Faustos allege that Defendants Credigy Services Corporation, Credigy Receivables Inc., and Credigy Solutions Inc. (collectively “Credigy”) and five Credigy employees engaged in an unlawful letter-writing and telephone campaign in an effort to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hyde & Drath v. BakerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Pioche Mines Consolidated, Inc., Ely Valley Mines, Inc., and John Janney v. Helen Dolman, John Janney v. Helen DolmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
- Federal Aviation Administration and United States of America v. M. Marshall Landy and International Aircraft Leasing, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Dixon v. Certainteed Corp.District Court, D. Kansas · 1996
- Turner v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- In re Outsidewall Tire LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2010
- Patrick v. Teays Valley Trustees, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. West Virginia · 2013
- Azarax, Inc. v. Wireless Communications Venture LLCDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2018
- Carolina M Lopez, et al. v. Bell Bank, et al.District Court, D. Arizona · 2026
- Hughes v. Uber Technologies, Inc.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2025
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.