Legal Opinion

Kifer v. School District No. 394

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided September 12, 1979No. 12511PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

This appeal must be dismissed for noncompliance with I.R.C.P. 54(b). Only the defendant school district moved for and was granted summary judgment. The complaint named three defendants: the school district; the teacher, Stephen Stanley; and Phillip Stanley, the superintendent of the school district. Judgment of dismissal was entered only in favor of defendant school district. The necessary certification is not present in the appeal record, and hence this Court is without jurisdiction.

The motion for summary judgment was heard on December 10, 1976, at which time, according to the court minutes,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dawson v. MeadIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Pichon v. L. J. Broekemeier, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Merchants, Inc. v. Intermountain Industries, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Gerry v. JohnstonIdaho Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Long v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1979

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Davis v. PeacockIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Kessler v. BarowskyIdaho Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Bank of Idaho v. NessethIdaho Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Kifer v. School Dist. No. 394Idaho Supreme Court · 1979
  5. State v. HoffmanIdaho Supreme Court · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API