Legal Opinion

Gerry v. Johnston

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided January 21, 1963No. 9012PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McQUADE, Justice.

Gerry commenced this action to recover damages from Johnston alleging that Johnston had wrongfully cut timber on his land. Johnston filed a cross complaint seeking specific performance of an alleged oral contract between Gerry and Johnston for the sale of certain timber on land owned by Gerry. In the alternative, Johnston sought damages occasioned by the alleged breach of the oral contract by Gerry.

A trial was had and each of the parties made a motion for a directed verdict. The trial judge granted each motion. Defendant Johnston moved for a new trial upon his…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. ANDERSON ET UX. v. MoothartOregon Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Sorensen v. JacobsonMontana Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Gullicksen v. ShadoanMontana Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Bell v. ShieldsIdaho Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Burkhart v. CARTWRIGHTOregon Supreme Court · 1960

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Viani v. Aetna Insurance CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Idah-Best, Inc. v. First Security Bank of Idaho, N.A.Idaho Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Clark v. FosterIdaho Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Merchants, Inc. v. Intermountain Industries, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Southland Produce Company v. BelsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1975

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API