Legal Opinion

Kifer v. School Dist. No. 394

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided September 12, 1979No. 12511PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

599 P.2d 302 (1979)

100 Idaho 41

Mervin KIFER, as general guardian of Mervin Kifer, Jr., a minor, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 394, Defendant-Respondent,

Stephen Stanley and Phillip Stanley, Defendants.

No. 12511.

Supreme Court of Idaho.

September 12, 1979.

Jerrold E. Park, St. Maries, for plaintiff-appellant.

Phillip M. Barber of Elam, Burke, Jeppesen, Evans & Boyd, Boise, for defendant-respondent.

Before SHEPARD, C.J., McFADDEN, DONALDSON and BISTLINE, JJ., and SCOGGIN, J. Pro Tem.

2Per curiam

This appeal must be dismissed for noncompliance with I.R.C.P. 54(b). Only the defendant school district…

Also in this document: Dissent.

3Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Richard Lambertson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
  2. Dawson v. MeadIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Edwin M. Gaudet v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
  4. Julie R. Blitz v. Janet M. Boog, Julie R. Blitz v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
  5. Pichon v. L. J. Broekemeier, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1978

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by6 opinions

  1. Davis v. PeacockIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Kessler v. BarowskyIdaho Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Loomis, Inc. v. CudahyIdaho Supreme Court · 1980
  4. State v. HoffmanIdaho Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Loomis, Inc. v. CudahyIdaho Supreme Court · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API