Kifer v. School Dist. No. 394
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
599 P.2d 302 (1979)
100 Idaho 41
Mervin KIFER, as general guardian of Mervin Kifer, Jr., a minor, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 394, Defendant-Respondent,
Stephen Stanley and Phillip Stanley, Defendants.
No. 12511.
Supreme Court of Idaho.
September 12, 1979.
Jerrold E. Park, St. Maries, for plaintiff-appellant.
Phillip M. Barber of Elam, Burke, Jeppesen, Evans & Boyd, Boise, for defendant-respondent.
Before SHEPARD, C.J., McFADDEN, DONALDSON and BISTLINE, JJ., and SCOGGIN, J. Pro Tem.
2Per curiam
This appeal must be dismissed for noncompliance with I.R.C.P. 54(b). Only the defendant school district…
Also in this document: Dissent.
3Cases cited17 opinions
- Richard Lambertson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- Dawson v. MeadIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
- Edwin M. Gaudet v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- Julie R. Blitz v. Janet M. Boog, Julie R. Blitz v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
- Pichon v. L. J. Broekemeier, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1978
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by6 opinions
- Davis v. PeacockIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
- Kessler v. BarowskyIdaho Supreme Court · 1997
- Loomis, Inc. v. CudahyIdaho Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. HoffmanIdaho Supreme Court · 1983
- Loomis, Inc. v. CudahyIdaho Supreme Court · 1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.