Chandler v. People's Savings Bank
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sacramento County, and from an order refusing a new trial. The nature of the action and the facts out of which it arose are stated in the prior opinions reported in 61 Cal. 396, 401. The further facts are stated in the opinion of Commissioner Searls.
1Opinion of the Court
The Court.
— In the above-entitled cause the judgment and order appealed from are affirmed, for the reasons given by Department One.
Temple, J., Thornton, J., and Sharpstein, J., dissented.
The following is the opinion of Department One above referred to, rendered on the 17th of September, 1886:— ■
Searls, C.
This cause was here in 1882, upon two appeals, one by the plaintiff from part of a judgment in favor of the intervenor, and the other by the intervenor from a part of the judgment in her favor, and from an order denying a new trial, in the Superior Court of Sacramento County.
Upon the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Chandler v. People's Savings BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
- Chandler v. People's Savings BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
- Chandler v. People's Savings BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
3Cited by3 opinions
- Barrett-Hicks Co. v. GlasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
- Tipton v. TiptonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Jacobs v. WalkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893