Chandler v. People's Savings Bank
California Supreme Court
Appeal by intervenor from a part of a judgment in her favor, and from an order denying a new trial, in the Superior Court of the County of Sacramento. Clark, J.
1Opinion of the Court
McKee, J.:
But in ascertaining the surplus to which the intervenor, who was the respondent in the foregoing case, number 7,802, and is appellant in this case, was entitled, as assignee of the Chandler note and mortgage, the Court found that, before the date of the note, Chandler and Poorman had been for many years engaged in several business enterprises, which resulted in outstanding unsettled accounts between them, and on January 12, 1876, Chandler executed the note and mortgage to cover whatever indebtedness he might owe Poorman individually or on account of the business enterprises between…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Martin v. BeckwithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1856
- Blood v. SayreSupreme Court of Vermont · 1843
3Cited by8 opinions
- Bassick Gold Mine Co. v. BeardsleySupreme Court of Colorado · 1910
- Walker v. First National BankOregon Supreme Court · 1903
- Chandler v. People's Savings BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
- Ryan Drug Co. v. HvambsahlWisconsin Supreme Court · 1896
- Chandler v. People's Savings BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.