Legal Opinion

Chandler v. People's Savings Bank

California Supreme Court

Decided September 21, 1882No. 7,802PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff from part of a judgment for intervener in the Superior Court of the County of Sacramento. Clark, J.

1Opinion of the Court

McKee, J.:

Samuel Poorman, being indebted to the Capital Bank, of Sacramento, by a promissory note for fifteen thousand dollars, secured its payment by a deed of trust made to the bank for two hundred acres of land near the City of Sacramento, and by two negotiable promissory notes, which he assigned to the bank—one made by L. C. Chandler, the plaintiff in this case, for three thousand dollars, secured by mortgage upon real property, and the other by one Todhunter for four thousand dollars. The Todhunter note was taken up when it fell due, and the amount was credited by the bank on Boorman’s…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Chandler v. People's Savings BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Chandler v. People's Savings BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API