Legal Opinion

Kral v. Boesch

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided December 24, 1996No. C9-96-1226Published

1Opinion of the Court

557 N.W.2d 597 (1996)

Alan A. KRAL, Respondent,

v.

Ralph BOESCH, Appellant.

No. C9-96-1226.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

December 24, 1996.

C. Thomas Wilson, Michael S. Dove, Gislason, Dosland, Hunter & Malecki, P.L.L.P., New Ulm, for Respondent.

Hugh T. Nierengarten, Nierengarten & Hippert, Ltd., New Ulm, for Appellant.

Considered and decided by KALITOWSKI, P.J., and CRIPPEN, and HARTEN, JJ.

OPINION

HARTEN, Judge.

Respondent Alan Kral commenced this declaratory action against appellant Ralph Boesch asserting (1) that he was entitled to a prescriptive easement to drain surface water through drainage…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Enderson v. KelehanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
  2. Duenow v. LindemanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  3. Sachs v. ChiatSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
  4. Pell v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
  5. Miles v. City of OakdaleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API