Legal Opinion

South Carolina Energy Users Committee v. Public Service Commission

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided September 14, 1998No. 24839PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

FINNEY, Chief Justice:

This is an appeal1 from a circuit court order upholding an order of the Public Service Commission (PSC) which approved a rate increase for respondent SCE&G. Appellant contends the evidence does not support the rate of return on equity awarded in the order, and that the PSC exceeded its authority in authorizing a Storm Damage Reserve Fund. We affirm.

Appellant first contends that the PSC erred in allowing SCE&G a 12% return on equity. It concedes that expert testimony in the record supports this rate, but argues that the award itself is flawed because it rests on a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Southern Home Insurance v. Burdette's Leasing Service, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1977
  2. Hamm v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1990
  3. Hamm v. South Carolina Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
  4. Heater of Seabrook, Inc. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
  5. Heater of Seabrook Inc. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Daufuskie Island Utility Co. v. South Carolina Office of Regulatory StaffSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API