South Carolina Energy Users Committee v. Public Service Commission
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
FINNEY, Chief Justice:
This is an appeal1 from a circuit court order upholding an order of the Public Service Commission (PSC) which approved a rate increase for respondent SCE&G. Appellant contends the evidence does not support the rate of return on equity awarded in the order, and that the PSC exceeded its authority in authorizing a Storm Damage Reserve Fund. We affirm.
Appellant first contends that the PSC erred in allowing SCE&G a 12% return on equity. It concedes that expert testimony in the record supports this rate, but argues that the award itself is flawed because it rests on a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Southern Home Insurance v. Burdette's Leasing Service, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1977
- Hamm v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1990
- Hamm v. South Carolina Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
- Heater of Seabrook, Inc. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
- Heater of Seabrook Inc. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Daufuskie Island Utility Co. v. South Carolina Office of Regulatory StaffSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2017