Legal Opinion
Heater of Seabrook Inc. v. Public Service Commission
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided July 21, 1998No. 24821PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WALLER, Justice:
On appeal is an order denying Appellant Heater of Sea-brook’s application for a rate increase. We reverse the Public Service Commission’s order and remand for further findings.
FACTS/PROCEDURAL POSTURE
On January 13,1994 Heater of Seabrook (“Utility”), a water and sewer utility, applied to Respondent Public Service Commission (“PSC”) for a rate increase. Utility sought a rate increase of 10.40% for water and 34.02% for sewer, for a combined overall rate increase of 20.67%. The South Carolina Consumer Advocate and the Town of Seabrook Island were granted leave to intervene. After…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Palmetto Alliance, Inc. v. South Carolina Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1984
- Able Communications, Inc. v. South Carolina Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1986
- Patton v. South Carolina Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1984
- Hamm v. South Carolina Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
- Heater of Seabrook, Inc. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Brown v. South Carolina Department of Health & Environmental ControlSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
- Porter v. Labor DepotCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2007
- Utilities Services of South Carolina, Inc. v. South Carolina Office of Regulatory StaffSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
- Office of Regulatory Staff v. South Carolina Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2007
- South Carolina Energy Users Committee v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998