Legal Opinion

Heater of Seabrook, Inc. v. Public Service Commission

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided August 12, 1996No. 24473PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TOAL, Justice:

In this rate case, Appellant Heater of Seabrook, Inc. (“Heater”) appeals the circuit court’s order affirming the Public Service Commission’s denial of Heater’s request for an increase in its water and sewer rates. We reverse, finding the Public Service Commission (“Commission” or “PSC”) abused its discretion in several respects.

Factual/Procedural Background

Heater is a utility company providing water and sewer services to the Town of Seabrook Island (“Town”). On January 13, 1994, Heater filed an application for an increase in its water and sewer rates. Consumer Advocate Steven…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1978
  2. Patton v. South Carolina Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1984
  3. Hamm v. South Carolina Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
  4. Hamm v. South Carolina Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
  5. Nucor Steel, A Division of Nucor Corp v. South Carolina Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1994

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Porter v. South Carolina Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
  2. Porter v. SC PUBLIC SERVICE COM'NSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
  3. Utilities Services of South Carolina, Inc. v. South Carolina Office of Regulatory StaffSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
  4. Heater of Seabrook Inc. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
  5. Kiawah Property Owners Group v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2004

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API