Legal Opinion

State v. Foy

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 18, 1998No. 96-1757PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ANDREASEN, Justice.

Anthony Foy appeals from the judgment and sentences entered following his guilty plea to four drug-related offenses. Foy claims he should have been afforded an opportunity to withdraw his plea of guilty when the State decided it was not bound by the plea agreement. Because we find that Foy violated the terms of the agreement, we reject his argument and affirm.

I. Background Facts and Proceedings.

On October 16, 1995, the State charged Foy by trial information with four criminal counts: possession of a controlled substance, to-wit: more than fifty grams of cocaine base with…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. HinnersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1991
  2. State v. HovindSupreme Court of Iowa · 1988
  3. State v. BlumSupreme Court of Iowa · 1997
  4. State v. BarkerCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1991
  5. State v. AschanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1985

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. CarrilloSupreme Court of Iowa · 1999
  2. State v. HamrickSupreme Court of Iowa · 1999
  3. State v. WarnerMontana Supreme Court · 2015
  4. State of Iowa v. Jennifer Lynn TuckerCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2021
  5. State of Iowa v. Jessie Lynn HillCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2025

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API