State v. Blum
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
HARRIS, Justice.
We affirm the district court’s denial of postconviction relief. The defendant fared better in a prior appeal. In Blum v. State, 510 N.W.2d 175, 180 (Iowa App.1993), our court of appeals reversed the denial of relief and remanded for further proceedings. The case is before us for our review of the record made following remand. We think the second postconvietion hearing accorded Blum everything to which he was entitled, and discloses he was correctly denied relief.
Because the facts were recited in the court of appeals decision, a brief sketch will suffice here. The defendant,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Hinkle v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1980
- State v. RamirezSupreme Court of Iowa · 1987
- Overton v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1992
- Hahn v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1981
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Osborn v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1998
- State v. SpeedSupreme Court of Iowa · 1998
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Iowa · 2008
- State v. KukowskiSupreme Court of Iowa · 2005
- State v. FoySupreme Court of Iowa · 1998
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.