Legal Opinion

State v. Aschan

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided April 17, 1985No. 84-788PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOLLE, Justice.

Defendant Mark Aschan contends that his substantive due process rights under the fourteenth amendment to the United States Constitution were violated when the State terminated a pretrial diversion agreement. Under the terms of that agreement, the State had placed defendant in a sexual abuse treatment program and agreed that if he satisfactorily completed the program he would be allowed to plead guilty to an aggravated misdemeanor rather than being prosecuted for the felony offense of sexual abuse in the second degree.' Subsequently, the prosecution terminated the agreement,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Bordenkircher v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. AlbrightSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State v. HovindSupreme Court of Iowa · 1988
  3. State v. BarkerCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1991
  4. State v. FoySupreme Court of Iowa · 1998
  5. Mark A. Aschan v. C.J. Auger Thomas J. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API