State v. Nichols
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
JAMES K. PREWITT, Judge.
Following trial by jury, Defendant was convicted of possession of a controlled substance and sentenced to five years in prison. Defendant appeals presenting three points relied on, including that the evidence was insufficient to sustain the conviction.
“In reviewing to determine if evidence is sufficient, an appellate court considers the evidence together with all reasonable inferences drawn therefrom, in the light most favorable to the verdict, and disregards all contrary evidence and inferences.” State v. Yarber, 5 S.W.3d 592, 593 (Mo.App.1999). We state the evidence…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. BarberSupreme Court of Missouri · 1982
- State v. WoodworthMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
- State v. JansonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
- State v. ReynoldsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
- State v. YarberMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. SmithMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
- State v. ColeMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
- State v. DavisMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007
- State v. TeagueMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
- State v. AdamsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.