Legal Opinion

Sphier v. Michael

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 22, 1924PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

This suit arises from an attempt to revoke an agency contract. D. H. Sphier, plaintiff herein, is an aged Armenian, a fellow countryman and a fellow church member of defendant John Michael, and, previous to the time the suit was brought, his intimate friend. Neither can read or write the English language, but Michael is a merchant, a banker for His countrymen, and has accumulated much wealth. The whole of plaintiff’s property is represented by the structure that bears his name and the lot on which it stands.

Michael testified that he entered into the contract with Sphier which forms the basis…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hunt v. Rousmanier's AdministratorsSupreme Court of the United States · 1823
  2. Wakeman v. Wheeler & Wilson Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1886
  3. Pierce v. Tennessee Coal, Iron & RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  4. Schell v. . PlumbNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  5. Louque v. DejanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1911

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Halloran-Judge Trust Co. v. HeathUtah Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Scott v. HallOregon Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Marnon v. Vaughan Motor Co., Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Michael v. SphierOregon Supreme Court · 1929
  5. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of ClostermannOregon Supreme Court · 1976

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API