Legal Opinion
Michael v. Sphier
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided June 4, 1929PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
The defendant challenges the plaintiff ’s right to a partition. 20 Stand. Ency. of Proeed., p. 1005, defines “partition” thus:
“Partition is the act or proceeding by which co-owners of property cause it to be either divided into as many shares as there are owners, according to their interests therein, or, if that cannot be equitably done, to be sold for the best obtainable price and the proceeds distributed.”
In Clark v. Richardson, 32 Iowa, 399, this subject was at issue, and the court, in the following language, stated its view as to the purpose of partition:
“The object of the action of…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Berry v. DonaldSupreme Court of Iowa · 1915
- Donaldson v. AllenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1908
- Oliver v. LansingNebraska Supreme Court · 1899
- Hoffman v. SmithMississippi Supreme Court · 1884
- Watson v. SutroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Cooley v. CooleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1969
- Killam v. KillamOregon Supreme Court · 1968
- McMillan v. FollansbeeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
- Maupin v. OpieCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
- Owen v. Zorn Farms, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.