Legal Opinion

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Clostermann

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 23, 1976PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

This disciplinary proceeding arises out of the termination of the custodianship of the accused over his late ward, Kenneth D. Hauser. The circuit court for Multnomah County (Dickson, J.) created the custodianship in October 1967, after finding that Hauser was mentally ill. The court paroled Hauser to the accused. On November 19, 1973, the same court (McLennan, J.) found Hauser not to be mentally ill and revoked the parole.

After the parole was revoked, Hauser and his attorney asked the accused to surrender various securities and other property belonging to Hauser. The accused refused to do so.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Todd v. Superior Court of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Sphier v. MichaelOregon Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Marnon v. Vaughan Motor Co., Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1950

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. KerpelmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
  2. In Re AllenOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Matter of NorwoodSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1979
  4. Lee Pacific Properties, Inc. v. Century Pacific Equity Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  5. Matter of NorwoodSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API