Legal Opinion

Standard Oil Co. v. Helmick

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 11, 1897No. 18,038PublishedCited by 25 opinions

Prom the Lake Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcCabe, J.

The appellee sued the appellant to recover damages for a personal injury, caused to him, as alleged, by the negligence of the appellant as the employer of the appellee. The circuit court overruled a demurrer, for want of sufficient facts, to the complaint. The issues formed upon the complaint were tried by a jury, resulting in a special verdict under the law of 1895, upon which the court rendered judgment for the plaintiff-.

The errors assigned call in question the action of the court in overruling the demurrer to the complaint^ and the sufficiency of the facts found in the special verdict to…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Wabash, St. Louis & Pacific Railway Co. v. LockeIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Indiana, Bloomington & Western Railway Co. v. BarnhartIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Indianapolis & St. Louis Railway Co v. WatsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Board of Commissioners v. BonebrakeIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Jenney Electric Light & Power Co. v. MurphyIndiana Supreme Court · 1888

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. ClarkIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912
  2. Rice v. . Eureka Paper Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1903
  3. McFarlan Carriage Co. v. PotterIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. BerryIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Coolidge v. HallauerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1905

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API