Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Beacon Valley Rubber Co.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided October 9, 1888PublishedCited by 46 opinions

Action for a malicious prosecution; brought to the Superior Court in New Haven County, and tried to the jury before Fenn, J. Verdict for the defendants, and appeal by the plaintiff for error in the rulings and charge of the court. The case is sufficiently stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtCarpenter, J.

In 1885 the plaintiff was doing business in the name of “R. Thompson,” and purchased goods through the agency of one Squires of the Beacon Valley Rubber Works. The defendant corporation was organized early in the year 1886. On April 14th of that year, the defendant, through the same agent, Squires, consigned certain goods to the plaintiff for sale, who was then doing business in his own name. In June a small portion of the goods was sold, and the cash received therefor remitted to the, defendant by Squires, less the price of one garment purchased in 1885 which he received, crediting the price…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Stone v. StevensSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1837

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. DeLaurentis v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  2. Vandersluis v. WeilSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
  3. Mulligan v. RiouxSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  4. Falls Church Group, Ltd. v. Tyler, Cooper & Alcorn, LLPSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
  5. E. M. Loew's Enterprises, Inc. v. SurabianSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API