Legal Opinion
CATERPILLAR, INC. v. Brock
Kentucky Supreme Court
Decided February 22, 1996No. 95-SC-426-CLPublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REYNOLDS, Justice.
The United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit has requested certification of the law as to the following question:
DID KENTUCKY REVISED STATUTE 411.182(1) NEGATE AND/OR OVERRULE KENTUCKY REVISED STATUTE 411.320(1)?
We hold the question which has been certified is answered in the affirmative. KRS 411.182(1) negated KRS 411.320(1).
The basis of the challenge arises from the following statement of facts and nature of the case.
Brock is a long-time bulldozer operator for Nally & Hamilton (“N & H”), a reclamation company doing work in coal mining areas in mountainous…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hilen v. HaysKentucky Supreme Court · 1984
- Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. RiceCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1989
- Reda Pump Co., a Div. of TRW, Inc. v. FinckKentucky Supreme Court · 1986
- Ex parte LawrenceCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924
- City of Henderson v. ConnellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
3Cited by19 opinions
- Morales v. American Honda Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- prod.liab.rep. (Cch) P 15,329 Pamela Morales, Guardian of Gary Thompson Bank of the Bluegrass and Trust Co., Conservator of Gary Thompson, Plaintiffs-Appellees/cross-Appellants v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc. Honda Motor Co., Ltd. Honda R&d Co., Ltd., Defendants-Appellants/cross-Appellees v. Pamela Morales, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- DeStock 14, Inc. v. LogsdonKentucky Supreme Court · 1999
- Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. ParrishKentucky Supreme Court · 2001
- Leslie v. Cincinnati Sub-Zero Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1998
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.