Legal Opinion
Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. Rice
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Decided February 3, 1989No. 87-CA-1780-MRPublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McDONALD, Judge:
This is an appeal of a products liability action. Anthony Rice brought suit against Ingersoll-Rand Company after he was injured on a mobile drill rig owned by his employer, Jackson Drilling Company, and manufactured by Ingersoll-Rand. Rice sought damages based upon negligence, breach of warranty and strict liability. Approximately two years later, Ingersoll-Rand filed a third-party complaint against Jackson Drilling Company, seeking contribution and indemnity from Jackson for any damages awarded to Rice. Because of In-gersoll-Rand’s delay in bringing its claim, the trial court…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Hilen v. HaysKentucky Supreme Court · 1984
- Jones v. Hutchinson Manufacturing, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1973
- Nichols Ex Rel. Nichols v. Union Underwear Co.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1980
- Post v. American Cleaning Equipment CorporationCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1969
- Orr v. ColemanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1970
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- 36 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 1338, prod.liab.rep. (Cch) P 13,478 Kathy D. Tobin, (91-6413), (91-6478) v. Astra Pharmaceutical Products, Inc., (91-6413), Duphar B v. (91-6478)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
- Toyota Motor Corp. v. GregoryKentucky Supreme Court · 2004
- Clark v. Hauck Manufacturing Co.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1995
- Dix & Associates Pipeline Contractors, Inc. v. KeyKentucky Supreme Court · 1990
- Larkin v. Pfizer, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2004
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.