Legal Opinion

Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Parrish

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided November 7, 2001No. 1998-SC-0820-DGPublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KELLER, Justice.

I. ISSUES

These asbestos product liability cases, which the circuit court consolidated for trial, present two issues for our consideration.

Parrish and Coyle sought damages from asbestos-manufacturer Owens Corning Fiberglas Corporation (“Owens Corning”), after they allegedly contracted asbestosis, a respiratory disease caused by the inhalation of asbestos fibers. But, while Appel-lees sought recovery only for their alleged asbestosis, the trial court allowed the jury to consider Appellees’ smoking histories in determining their comparative fault.1 The jury consequently allocated…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Hilen v. HaysKentucky Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Capital Holding Corp. v. BaileyKentucky Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Martin v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Ingram v. Acands, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  5. Floyd v. Carlisle Const. Co., Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1988

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. CertainTeed Corp. v. DexterKentucky Supreme Court · 2010
  2. McDONALD'S CORP. v. OgbornCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2009
  3. Morgan v. ScottKentucky Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Insight Kentucky Partners II, L.P. v. Preferred Automotive Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 2016
  5. Savage v. Three Rivers Medical CenterKentucky Supreme Court · 2012

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API