Legal Opinion

City of Henderson v. Connell

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided January 9, 1914PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Henderson Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Miller

Affirming

*731This ease raises the question of the right of cities of the third class to assess the cost of improving intersections of streets with sidewalks, curbs and gutters, against the abutting property.

The legislative charter granted to the city of Henderson in 1867 provided that all intersections of streets should be graded, guttered and stepping stones placed or cross-walks made, at the expense of the city; and by the amendment of 1880, said provision was re-incorporated into the charter of that year.

Henderson is a city of the third class; and by the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. International Harvester Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909
  2. Commonwealth v. PetriCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1906

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. CATERPILLAR, INC. v. BrockKentucky Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Ex parte LawrenceCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924
  3. Keenon v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
  4. Thomas v. McCainCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API