Legal Opinion

Klees v. Chicago & E. I. R. R.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 9, 1896PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Trespass on the Case, for personal injuries. Error to the Circuit Court of Will County; the Hon. Dorrance Dibell, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Justice Harker

delivered the opinion of the Court.

This suit was brought by Andrew Klees against the Chicago & E. Ill. Ry. Co., to recover for injuries sustained by him while engaged as engineer on a switch engine in the yards of the company at Chicago. The defense interposed was that the injury was caused by the negligence of other servants of the company engaged at the time in operating a road engine in the yards, and that they were fellow-servants with Klees. A trial was had in the Circuit Court by jury and a verdict of not guilty rendered under the peremptory direction of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Chicago & Northwestern Railroad v. MorandaIllinois Supreme Court · 1879
  2. Abend v. Terre Haute & Indianapolis RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1884
  3. State v. GattonOhio Court of Appeals · 1938
  4. North Chicago Rolling Mill Co. v. JohnsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Railway Co. v. MalaneyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1894

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Atchison & Eastern Bridge Co. v. MillerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905
  2. Illinois Central Railroad v. SwisherAppellate Court of Illinois · 1897
  3. Klees v. Chicago & E. I. R. R.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1899
  4. Aldrich v. Illinois Central RailroadAppellate Court of Illinois · 1909
  5. Wabash Railroad v. BhymerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API