Legal Opinion
Aronson & Co. v. Pearson
California Supreme Court
Decided August 28, 1926No. Docket No. L.A. 8378PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINCH, J., pro tem.
This is an appeal by the defendant from an order of the trial court denying her motion to discharge an attachment. The action was brought to recover on defendant’s liability as a stockholder of the Pearson Ranch Company, a corporation, having a capital stock of $500,000, divided into 5,000 shares of the par value of $100 each, of which the defendant is alleged to be the owner of 4997 shares. The corporation created an indebtedness of $188,000, evidenced by 188 first mortgage bonds, secured by a trust mortgage upon 1803.6 acres of land in Glenn County. Plaintiff! is the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Wenban Estate, Inc. v. HewlettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- County of San Luis Obispo v. GageCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Martin v. BeckerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Young v. RosenbaumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
- Coulter Dry Goods Co. v. WentworthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- McCall v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- Kane v. MendenhallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Mitchell v. Banking Corporation of Mont.Montana Supreme Court · 1929
- American Guaranty Corp. v. StoodyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Security-First National Bank of Los Angeles v. ChapmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.