Martinek v. State
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KLAPHAKE, Judge.
Appellant Lee Thomas Martinek appeals from an order denying his petition for postconviction relief. Appellant challenges the addition of a 10-year conditional release term to his sentence for second-degree criminal sexual conduct, arguing that the district court could not add sanctions after expiration of his sentence.
Because the district court judge’s letter to the Department of Corrections (DOC), which was neither filed in the court file nor served on appellant, is not an effective order to amend appellant’s sentence, and because appellant’s sentence expired before a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. PflepsenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- State v. WukawitzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
- State v. CalmesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
- State v. HoelzelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
- State v. ChristophersonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Robel Belay Kubrom v. State of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
- State v. FransonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2018
- State v. HenryCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012
- State v. HannamCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011
- Fidel Pizarro-Rios v. State of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2025
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.