Legal Opinion

State v. Hoelzel

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 14, 2002No. C8-00-851PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PAUL H. ANDERSON, Justice.

After a bench trial in Hennepin Count District Court, appellant Richard Alan Hoelzel was found guilty of a felony for burglary in the first degree and a gross misdemeanor for interference with an emergency call. The court stayed imposition of sentence on the gross misdemean- or, but refused to take further action on the felony. The state appealed and the Minnesota Court of Appeals held that the district court’s action was the functional equivalent of a stay of adjudication, and as such was improper under the circumstances. The court of appeals reversed and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. PflepsenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
  2. State v. LaTourelleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  3. State v. KrotzerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
  4. State v. PeroSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
  5. State v. ThomaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. LeeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
  2. State v. BussmannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
  3. State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
  4. State v. JeffriesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
  5. State of Minnesota v. Carl Lee NodesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API