Legal Opinion

Welsbach Light Co. v. Cosmopolitan Incandescent Gaslight Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Illnois

Decided February 16, 1900PublishedCited by 10 opinions

In Equity. Suit for infringement of a patent.

1Opinion of the Court

KOHLSAAT, District Judge.

This is a motion for a preliminary injunction, based upon the alleged infringement by defendant of the first claim of letters patent No. 407,963, dated July 30, 1889, issued *649to Frederick L. and William Stepney Raw son, and now the property, through mesne assignments, of complainant. The subject-maiter of the patent is a process for strengthening, for the purpose of handling and transportation, what is commonly called the “Welsbach” incandescent mantle, and said claim 1 reads as follows:

“The herein-described improvement in strengthening incandescent mantles, consisting…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Welsbach Light Co. v. Sunlight Incandescent Gas Lamp Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1898
  2. Welsbach Light Co. v. American Incandescent Lamp Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1899

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. William R. Thropp & Sons Co. v. De Laski & Thropp Circular Woven Tire Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1915
  2. De Laski & Thropp Circular Woven Tire Co. v. William R. Thropp & Sons Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1914
  3. Shreckhise v. RitchieCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1947
  4. Welsbach Light Co. v. Cosmopolitan Incandescent Light Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1900
  5. Wailes Dove-Hermiston Corp. v. Oklahoma Contracting Co.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1931

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API