Legal Opinion

Wailes Dove-Hermiston Corp. v. Oklahoma Contracting Co.

District Court, N.D. Texas

Decided March 13, 1931No. 3288-543PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ATWELL, District Judge.

Metal pipe lines that carry gas, water, and petroleum are buried in the ground. There is a soil stress from present chemicals and from the soil and temperature against which science has contended. The plaintiff’s patent No. 1733006 covers a method for coating pipe which is to be placed in the trench. The liquid itself doubtless has many merchantable virtues, and contributes tremendously to the efficacy and value of .the coating so administered.

The evidence discloses’ that as early as 1912 there was a rotary motion of the pipe at the time of the application of the fluid.…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. MacHine Co. v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Hotchkiss v. GreenwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
  3. Morley Sewing MacHine Co. v. LancasterSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  4. Consolidated Safety-Valve Co. v. Crosby Steam Gauge & Valve Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1885
  5. Kennedy v. HazeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1888

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Heden v. HillDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1996
  2. Twyman v. Radiant Glass Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
  3. Zanetti v. ZanettiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  4. Batcheller v. Henry Cole Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1934
  5. Youngs Rubber Corp. v. Allied Latex Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API