Henry Weiland v. American Airlines, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Judge REINHARDT dissented because he would hold that Weiland qualified for the exception in § 44729(e)(1)(A).
OPINION
MOTZ, Senior District Judge:
This case involves a difficult question of statutory construction that may currently apply only to a class of one. Although somewhat uncomfortable with the conclusion we reach, we hold that Plaintiff Henry Weiland, who turned 60 six days before the FAA’s Age 60 Rule was abrogated by the Fair Treatment for Experienced Pilots Act (“FTEPA”), does not qualify for one of the FTEPA’s exceptions to non-retroactivity. The district court reached the same…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Edward Zadrozny v. Bank of New York MellonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Emory v. United Air Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2013
- Brooks v. Air Line Pilots Ass'n, InternationalDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
3Cited by2 opinions
- Daniel Bill v. Warren BrewerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Beverly Burton v. the Prudential Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016