Legal Opinion

Brooks v. Air Line Pilots Ass'n, International

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided June 30, 2009No. Civil Action 08-1817 (JR)PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

JAMES ROBERTSON, District Judge.

Plaintiffs, all Continental Airlines employees over sixty years old, ask this court to order their union, defendant Air Line Pilots Association International, to withdraw a grievance challenging Continental’s interpretation of the Fair Treatment for Experienced Pilots Act, 49 U.S.C. § 44729. Plaintiffs allege that ALPA filed the grievance with the age-discriminatory intent of benefiting its younger members at the expense of older ones. Defendant moves to dismiss. Because plaintiffs have not yet been and may never be injured by ALPA’s grievance, their…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. MedImmune, Inc. v. Genentech, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Texas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  5. Air Line Pilots Ass'n v. O'NeillSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Jones v. Air Line Pilots Ass'n, InternationalCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2011
  2. Emory v. United Air Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2013
  3. Avera v. United Air LinesDistrict Court, N.D. Florida · 2010
  4. Henry Weiland v. American Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  5. Henry Weiland v. American Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API