Beverly Burton v. the Prudential Insurance Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM *
Appellant Beverly Burton, on behalf of herself and a potential class of California life insurance beneficiaries, appeals from the district court’s judgment in favor of the Prudential Life Insurance Company of America (“Prudential”) under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). As the parties are familiar with the facts, we do not recount them here. We review de novo both questions of statutory interpretation, Schleining v. Thomas, 642 F.3d 1242, 1246 (9th Cir. 2011), and dismissals for failure to state a claim under Rule 12(b)(6), Weiland v. Am. Airlines, Inc., 778 F.3d 1112,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Concha v. LondonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- People v. ColeCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- In Re ReevesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
- Schleining v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Kaass Law v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Bentley v. United of Omaha Life Ins. Co.District Court, C.D. California · 2019