Legal Opinion

State v. Holley

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 3, 1990No. 1207PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosalyn B. Bell, J.

This case involves an appeal by the State from an order dismissing an indictment against Parren Augustus Holley on the ground that his trial was not commenced within 180 days after Holley filed a request for disposition of the charges pursuant to the Interstate Agreement on Detainers.1 The question presented is whether the 180-day speedy trial provision of the Interstate Agreement on Detainers continues in effect after the defendant’s term of imprisonment in another state ends.

We have not had the occasion to address this particular issue under the Interstate Agreement on Detainers (I.A.D.).…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Kaczorowski v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
  2. State v. BarnesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
  3. State v. TarangoNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. State v. QuirozNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. State v. SmithSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Swanigan v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. Odhinn v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Odhinn v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  4. State v. MeadowsCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2024
  5. State v. MeadowsCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2024

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API