Legal Opinion · Dissent

Odhinn v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 2003No. 02-281Published

1DissentGolden, Justice

[136] I respectfully dissent. The 180-day speedy trial period under the Interstate Agreement on Detainers (IAD) was to expire on May 26, 2001. Nebraska released Odhinn from imprisonment, however, on May 15, 2001, before expiration of the 180-day speedy trial period. The "majority rule," acknowledged by Odhinn's appellate defense counsel, holds that if the sending state (Nebraska) releases the accused (Odhinn) within the 180-day period, then the accused (Odhinn) is, under the plain language of the IAD, no longer a "prisoner" to whom the IAD provisions apply; therefore, the IAD's speedy trial…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. Michael RoyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
  2. State v. TarangoNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. State v. JulianSupreme Court of Kansas · 1988
  4. Cunningham v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  5. State v. HolleyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API