Swanigan v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
GLICKMAN, Associate Judge:
While he was serving a prison sentence in Virginia, appellant Michael Swanigan made a request under Article III of the Interstate Agreement on Detainers (IAD) for a final disposition of charges that were pending against him in Superior Court of the District of Columbia. When, despite his request, Swanigan was not brought to trial within the 180-day period specified by the IAD, he moved to dismiss his indictment in this jurisdiction with prejudice. The trial court denied the motion, concluding that the IAD did not apply to Swani-gan’s case because he had finished…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. MauroSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Carchman v. NashSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Alabama v. BozemanSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- United States v. Ronnie Dean HallCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Ronney Lee Snyder v. George SumnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Cooper v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011