Legal Opinion

Lane v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County

Decided July 12, 1990No. 104-S-1989PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOWLING, J.,

Can a party object to interrogatories or a request for documents after the 30-day period specified in the rules?

The instant case concerns three discovery requests propounded by plaintiffs upon defendant Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company involving two separate requests for production of documents and a set of interrogatories.

On October 20, 1989, plaintiffs’ first request for production of documents was served on Hartford. On February 13, 1990, plaintiffs served a second *538request for production of documents as well as a set of written interrogatories.

No answers or objections…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Masland v. BachmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Nissley v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  3. Perry v. GolubDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1976
  4. Krewson v. City of QuincyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1988
  5. Davis v. RomneyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1971

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. McGovern v. Hospital Service Ass'n of Northeastern PennsylvaniaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  2. McGovern v. Hospital Service Ass'n of Northeastern PennsylvaniaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API