Coyle v. Lamb
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco denying a new trial. A. A. Sanderson, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcFARLAND, J.
This action is brought by the plaintiff, Mary Coyle, as administratrix of the estate of her deceased husband, John Coyle, against the defendants as executors of the *265last will of J. C. Wilmerding, deceased. Judgment was for the •defendants, and plaintiff appeals from an order denying her motion for a new trial.
The substantial averments of the complaint are that said Wilmerding and one Fargo, on April 15, 1876, leased to the deceased, John Coyle, for a term of ten years then next ensuing, a certain lot of land at Boardman Place; that Coyle was to have the right to build a house upon the lot and…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Hudgins v. Standard Oil Co. of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Rhoda v. County of AlamedaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Rapp v. Southern Service Co.California Court of Appeal · 1931
- Kushner v. Home Service Co.California Court of Appeal · 1928
- Griffin v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.