Burnham v. Burnham
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the CourtThaxter, J.
This is an action of trespass quare clausum. The defendants justify their entry on the plaintiff’s land as agents of Mary L. Burnham, who, owning property adjoining that of the plaintiff, claims a right of way by prescription across his premises. The jury found for the defendants and the case is before us on a general motion and on exceptions.
Mary L. Burnham, the wife of one defendant and the mother of the other, owned a lot of land adjoining that of the plaintiff, who was her husband’s brother. The plaintiff’s father had at one time many years before owned both parcels, and had conveyed in…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Truc v. FieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
- Barber v. BaileySupreme Court of Vermont · 1912
- Swan v. MunchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
- Bradley's Fish Co. v. DudleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1870
- Merrick v. SchleuderSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
3Cited by12 opinions
- Dalton v. Real Estate & Improvement Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Blackmer v. WilliamsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
- Jacobs v. BoomerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1970
- MacDonald Properties, Inc. v. Bel-Air Country ClubCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Lyons v. Baptist School of Christian TrainingSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2002
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.