Truc v. Field
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtWait, J.
The plaintiffs appeal from a decree dismissing their bill with costs, and declaring that they have no right, *527title or interest to have water flow to their premises from a spring upon premises occupied by Charles Field, the original defendant, and owned by Fannie M. Field, his wife. In consequence of suggestions made at the argument of the appeal, Fannie M. Field has, by amendment, been made a defendant and has assented to and accepted all proceedings theretofore taken in the cause. We disregard any questions which might have required consideration in the absence of such amendment. No appeal…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ricard v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1822
- Bigelow Carpet Co. v. WigginMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
- Philbrick v. EwingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1867
- Inhabitants of Deerfield v. Connecticut River RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887
- Van Allen v. SweetMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- MacLeod v. DavisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- Bills v. NunnoMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1976
- LaChance v. First National Bank & Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
- Fortier v. H. P. Hood & Sons, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
- Tucker v. PochMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.