Legal Opinion

Allen v. Chatfield

California Supreme Court

Decided February 5, 1916No. S. F. No. 6416. In BankPublishedCited by 17 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

The complaint is in the form of a common law count for money had and received by the defendant for the plaintiff’s use, the amount thereof being five thousand dollars. The answer denies the allegations of the complaint. The court found that all the allegations of the complaint are untrue. Judgment was given- for the defendant. The plaintiff’s motion for a new trial was denied. From the order denying the same the plaintiff appeals, claiming that the findings and judgment are contrary to the evidence. We have reached the conclusion that this claim must be sustained.

The object of the action was…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Doak v. BrusonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Eddy v. . DavisNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  3. Bigler v. . MorganNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
  4. Ladd & Tilton v. MasonOregon Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Sheehy v. MilesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Hind v. Oriental Products Co., Inc.California Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Klein v. MarkarianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Backus v. SessionsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Roven v. MillerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  5. Smith v. HillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API