Legal Opinion

Kramer v. May Lumber Company

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 3, 1968No. 24882PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAUGHMER, Commissioner.

Plaintiffs sued for loss of services and medical expenses incurred as a result of personal injuries to their minor daughter which they alleged were caused by the negligence of the defendants. The verdict was for plaintiffs and against the defendants, May Lumber Company and Hazel Withee, in the amount of $9500. Both defendants have appealed.

In the spring of 1965, the defendant, Hazel Withee and her husband, Adelbert Withee, began construction of a residence at 11304 East 39th Street, Independence, Missouri. The plaintiffs, Andrew Kramer and Eleanor E. Kramer, with their…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Lucas v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Plank v. R. J. Brown Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1933
  3. Schwend v. St. Louis Transit Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1904
  4. Clymer v. TennisonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1964
  5. Derschow v. St. Louis Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1936

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hicks v. Graves Truck Lines, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Wilson v. LockwoodMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Kennedy v. TallentMissouri Court of Appeals · 1973
  4. Thienes v. Harlin Fruit CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1973
  5. Chaussard v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1976

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API