Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Lockwood

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 27, 1986No. WD 37075, WD 37071PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LOWENSTEIN, Presiding Judge.

The infant plaintiff brought this suit by his next friend, his mother, on a medical malpractice negligence theory against defendant-appellant Dr. Lockwood, who performed a circumcision on the child at defendant St. Luke’s Hospital. The child’s parents also brought a separate count against the doctor, the hospital and the manufacturer. In removing the foreskin, Dr. Lockwood used a Plastibell device manufactured by defendant Hollister, Inc. The device was supposed to fall off after eight days. However, it did not and as a result, the child was injured.

The hospital…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Keener v. Dayton Electric Manufacturing CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1969
  2. Fowler v. Park Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1984
  3. Aiken Ex Rel. Aiken v. ClarySupreme Court of Missouri · 1965
  4. Yoos v. Jewish Hospital of St. LouisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. Busch & Latta Painting Corp. v. State Highway CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Petriello v. KalmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  2. Ford Motor Co. v. MilesTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Stephen Jenkins, and Mary Ann Bakke v. McLean Hotels, Inc., Howard Johnson CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988
  4. Williams v. DausMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003
  5. Blake v. IrwinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API