Wilson v. Lockwood
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
LOWENSTEIN, Presiding Judge.
The infant plaintiff brought this suit by his next friend, his mother, on a medical malpractice negligence theory against defendant-appellant Dr. Lockwood, who performed a circumcision on the child at defendant St. Luke’s Hospital. The child’s parents also brought a separate count against the doctor, the hospital and the manufacturer. In removing the foreskin, Dr. Lockwood used a Plastibell device manufactured by defendant Hollister, Inc. The device was supposed to fall off after eight days. However, it did not and as a result, the child was injured.
The hospital…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Keener v. Dayton Electric Manufacturing CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1969
- Fowler v. Park Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1984
- Aiken Ex Rel. Aiken v. ClarySupreme Court of Missouri · 1965
- Yoos v. Jewish Hospital of St. LouisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
- Busch & Latta Painting Corp. v. State Highway CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Petriello v. KalmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Ford Motor Co. v. MilesTexas Supreme Court · 1998
- Stephen Jenkins, and Mary Ann Bakke v. McLean Hotels, Inc., Howard Johnson CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988
- Williams v. DausMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003
- Blake v. IrwinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.