In re Sekulich

In its first proposition of law, appellant asserts that “[a] finding of delinquency by a juvenile court, not accompanied by a final dispositional order, is not a final appealable order.”

We find this proposition of law to be without merit.

It is rudimentary that a finding of delinquency by a juvenile court, unaccompanied by any disposition thereof, is not a final appealable order. In re Whittington (1969), 17 Ohio App. 2d 164; In re Bolden (1973), 37 Ohio App. 2d 7.

*15In the cause sub judice, however, the trial court assessed the appellee a $50 fine and costs, in full compliance with R. C.…