Legal Opinion

Cunningham v. Blythe

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 11, 1942No. 35,640PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hoch, J.:

This was an action to recover from county commissioners and their bondsmen for damages which the plaintiff alleged resulted from the wrongful taking and leasing of real estate belonging to him. The appeal is by the plaintiff from an order sustaining defendants’ objection to the introduction of evidence, and from judgment thereupon entered for the defendants.

Treating the objection to introduction of evidence as tantamount to a motion for judgment on the pleadings and the opening statement, the question here is whether upon the allegations of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Broom v. DouglassSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
  2. Mygatt v. . WashburnNew York Court of Appeals · 1857
  3. State ex rel. Reynolds v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  4. Board of County Commissioners v. HopperSupreme Court of Kansas · 1922
  5. State ex rel. Coleman v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Brown v. Wichita State UniversitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1975
  2. Gomez v. HugCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1982
  3. In Re Petition of City of Shawnee for Annexation of LandSupreme Court of Kansas · 1984
  4. Board of County Commissioners v. AldenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1944
  5. Hendrix Ex Rel. Smith v. City of TopekaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1982

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API