Legal Opinion

Beavers v. Allstate Insurance

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 16, 1990No. C002266PublishedCited by 26 opinions

[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SPARKS, Acting P. J.

In this appeal we consider whether the trial court is empowered under Code of Civil Procedure section 629 to grant a partial judgment notwithstanding the verdict. We hold that it is and hence may properly grant a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict as to some but not all of the causes of action stated in the complaint.

A jury returned a verdict in favor of plaintiffs Michael and Linda Beavers awarding them $600,000 compensatory damages and $5 million punitive damages against defendants Allstate Insurance Company and J. H. Ferguson & Associates, Inc. The…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Brewer v. Second Baptist ChurchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. California Shoppers, Inc. v. Royal Globe Insurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1985
  3. Hergenrether v. EastCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Jensen v. Traders & General Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Jamison v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Helfand v. Nationall Union Fire InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  2. Fassberg Construction Co. v. Housing AuthorityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  3. Khajavi v. Feather River Anesthesia Medical GroupCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  4. Valentine v. Baxter Healthcare Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1999
  5. Fountain Valley Chateau Blanc Homeowner's Ass'n v. Department of Veterans AffairsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API