Holton v. Denaro
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.
This is an action of contract wherein the plaintiffs seek to recover for legal services and expenditures alleged to have been incurred in behalf of the defendant. The case was tried by a judge of the Municipal Court who found generally for the defendant and made a report containing all the material evidence. It does not appear that the defendant testified or made any binding admissions touching his liability.
The plaintiffs presented numerous requests for rulings. The first, to the effect that the plaintiffs were entitled to recover, apart from not conforming to Rule 35 of the Municipal Court…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- John Hetherington & Sons, Ltd. v. William Firth Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
- Haun v. LeGrandMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
- Kumin v. FineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
- Eddy v. JohnstonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
- Callahan v. GoldmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
3Cited by22 opinions
- Bresnick v. HeathMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- Gibbons v. DenoncourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
- Topjian v. Boston Casing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
- Weiner v. Egleston Amusement Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- Mazmanian v. KukenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.