Legal Opinion

Callahan v. Goldman

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided December 13, 1913PublishedCited by 12 opinions

The case was submitted on briefs.

1Opinion of the CourtLoring, J.

The plaintiff in this action was the lessee of the basement in Southwick block in the city of Lynn, under a lease for three years, from the then owner, dated June 1, 1907. The defendant succeeded to the reversion by force of a deed dated July 8, 1907. Under an earlier lease the plaintiff had installed in the basement four bowling alleys (which were his property), and the 1907 lease provided "that there shall be no forfeiture or breach of this lease for less than three months arrears of rent and then only on thirty days notice in writing to the lessee and mortgage[e] declaring a forfeiture and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Huntress v. HanleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Noble v. Mead-Morrison Manufacturing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
  2. Holton v. DenaroMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
  3. Jennings v. WallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  4. Kumin v. FineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
  5. Fleishbein v. ThorneWashington Supreme Court · 1937

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API