Legal Opinion

Badem Buildings v. Abrams

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 13, 1985PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— Order and judgment (one paper) Supreme Court, New York County (Elliott Wilk, J.), entered August 30, 1985, which, inter alia, consolidated two CPLR article 78 proceedings and a Martin Act (General Business Law art 23-A) civil prosecution brought by the Attorney-General, dismissed both article 78 proceedings, found defendants-appellants Louise Dembeck, Giora Neeman and Badem Buildings (Badem) in violation of the Martin Act and permanently enjoined them from directly or indirectly engaging in business relating to the offer and sale of public securities, including cooperative interests in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hutchins v. Conciliation & Appeals BoardNew York Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Yellon v. Reiner-Kaiser AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  3. MATTER OF PERLBINDER v. New York City Conciliation & Appeals Bd.New York Court of Appeals · 1986

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Badem Buildings v. AbramsNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. Treger Management Co. v. AbramsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  3. E. & R. Mavin Construction Ltd. v. AbramsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  4. State v. Rachmani Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API